Our Review: 

Founded in 2003 Shutterstock is the largest subscription based photo agency in the world. They recently added 1 million images to their collection in just 3 months. Shutterstock has reached one of the top positions in the marketplace by being innovative: they were the first to offer subscription microstock, first microstock agency to offer video footage and the first to crowdsource editorial images.

Good quality statistics always make me happy, how many people have viewed my portfolio, and any sites that don't allow me to see just how many people are online and browsing make me nervous (I admit some of the biggest sites don't need to do this - you know its going to be a lot of people with them), but when other smaller sites don't provide full information, just a box with "you have made 0 sales" I tend to be suspicious. Shutter stock is a site that provides excellent stats for numbers munchers like myself.

Sales at shutterstock have a definite bias towards recently uploaded images, and acceptance of more unusual subjects is high (shutterstock appear to be letting their technology and users decide if an image subject will sell rather than the feelings of a reviewer). If you can get accepted then it's a good place to start selling and see immediate sales. Sales do tend however to 'drop off' for older images in your portfolio.

Important note about the 'cost of a standard credit'
Shutterstock is a subscription service and you get paid each time one of the subscribers downloads an image, the subscribers pay different amounts for different lengths of subscription, I've based my cost of $0.50 per credit on their one day, 25 image download limit for $49. This is not really a good comparison to the other sites which allows a single download.

The subscription system places shutterstock into a different market compared to the other microstock sites, I'd still call it microstock, but it's microstock aimed square on at the design professional or design group, not Joe Bloggs and his three hours on Sunday afternoon webblog. From what I can see from my results it's a good market to serve. I also feel that people are slightly less careful about what they download if they have a subscription, as they have the freedom to download a small selection of images and try them out in a design without paying any more than if they just downloaded one final image. This process saves the designer collecting comp images and then going back to download the the full sized image for the selected design and rework it all. (obviously the designer has limits on their accounts and can't afford to go over those limits so they will only download images that they think they really need)

This site has carved out a slightly different market segment, and is difficult to compare directly to the other sites, but after several years of sales I have seen good results placing the site a number two in my top ten list.

Price per image below is calculated from the 'On Demand Subscription', (5 images any time over 1 year for 49USD). Images are significantly cheaper if a regular subscription is taken. Shutterstock also own the smaller microstock agency bigstockphoto which allows them to concentrate on their core business of subscription microstock and also take a share of the 'pay as you go' market

Visit the shutterstock photographers area

 

Site Details
Referral Scheme: 
Yes - 20% on sales of new subscriptions, $0.03 per image download from your referred photographers forever. Excellent scheme if you are able to refer other photographers. (compare rates)
Cost of a standard image (1600x1200) 2MP approx: 
9 Credits
Cost of 1 Credit (basic): 
$ 1
Real US$ Cost of 1 Standard Image: 
9 (compare prices)
Commission Level: 
$0.25 per image downloaded, $0.30/33 after $500 worth of downloads (compare)
Media Types (in addition to RF Images): 
This site accepts editorial images
This site accepts glamour photography
This site accepts video footage
(sort by agency)
FTP Upload: 

Address: ftp://ftp.shutterstock.com
Username: Your email address

Subscriptions: 

Length of Subscription (1,3,6,12 month),
Monthly: 25 images-vectors/day $249
Annual: 25 images-vectors/day $2559
(multiseat licenses on request)

(compare subscriptions)
Site Stats
Site Statistics
Approx. size of photo collection (0 = no current estimate): 
10,000,000 Images (compare)
Alexa Traffic Rank: 
1581 (a measure of the site popularity, lower number is better)
Alexa 3 Month Change: 
4% (measurement of the increase of site popularity compared with three months ago, negative is a decrease)
Launched: 
2004
Our Rating (0/10 = not fully reviewed): 
8/10

Anonymous's picture

question

Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 11/08/2008 - 06:25
They ask me to scan my passport to verify my identity. Even banks don't do that. What's the point of doing that? Thank you.
Steve Gibson's picture

Proof of Identity

Steve Gibson on Tue, 11/11/2008 - 06:03

I'm not sure which country you are from, but where I live, yes the banks do ask for your passport and/or several other forms of identity to prove you are who you say you are when you open an account, and they take a photocopy of it.

Most of the microstock sites which require ID will let you obfuscate details like your passport number if you are nervous of giving out this info, and most accept just a drivers license. If they did not do this then how would they guarantee to their customers that you were a genuine individual selling photos that you had shot instead of a villain who was stealing other photographers work?

Come and live in Australia, I need photo ID to go an buy a drink in a bar, and I'm 33!!!

Steve Gibson
Microstockinsider.com Editor

 

Anonymous's picture

There's a difference between

Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 21:03
There's a difference between showing someone your ID once at a bar and scanning in a copy of your ID and giving them a copy. The difference is that they now have a physical copy of your ID. What are they doing with that copy? What good is photo ID if there's no one physically standing there to verify it against? What good is photo ID in a community of professional photo shoppers? Any of the security controls for determining real or fake ID (such as texture, holograms, raised lettering are only verifiable on the actual ID itself. Do not give out your personal identification online unless you are looking for trouble!
Anonymous's picture

Shutterstock is good

Anders (not verified) on Wed, 03/11/2009 - 21:05
I have mad quite a bit of money on Shutterstock. You dont have to be a professional photograper. It's a great way to pay for your camera equipment. Try it out - there is nothing to lose... Shutterstock 
Anonymous's picture

Giving Out Government Isuued ID

Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/23/2009 - 05:58
Last night I signed up on shutterstock and they asked me to scan my passport to them. I'm just wondering if there is possible that in the future some hackers can hack their "security" servers and get all those passport copies information and use them illegally. And, by giving out personal ID to shutterstock, does it means all the rights of the pictures will be own by them and not the photographer?
Steve Gibson's picture

Possible

Steve Gibson on Thu, 04/23/2009 - 07:00

Hacking is always possible (but unlikely), but that is why any secret or restricted government information on computer is only ever allowed on computers that are on a network that is physically isolated from any network that could be accessed from the Internet. If you work in such a place you have two machines on your desk, or work in separate offices for secret and non secret data

A couple of the agencies ask for scans of ID (and I don't like it either, the only way they get away with it is because they are two of the biggest). Most other online services either post something to your address, make an automated phone call or send/take money from your credit card or bank account to confirm your ID. I'm not sure why microstock has to be different.

I sent my drivers licence, and stamped the word duplicate across it in semi transparent text. Most forms of ID have copy protection devices built in, but this is more a point of identity theft than someone taking the scan and pretending to be you in person.

There would be far more personal data available if hackers broke into the computer of the bank that you use, and not all banks use things like digital certificates or tokens, some just have secure logins like the microstock sites.

Sending your photo I'd has no effect on the ownership of the images, they still belong to you. The sites ask for your ID to protect them against fraud, some people steal photos, upload them for sales then take the money they earn and disappear, this helps to make that rare.

Send your comments to their customer support, If enough people complain about it then perhaps they will use some other method for verificiation in the future

Shutterstock are tested daily by McAfee Secure, I trust them as to 1000's of others, so the choice is yours.


Add new comment

Popular content